The Appellate Division, First Department, recently unanimously affirmed a judgment of $17.2 million against Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft in a legal malpractice action alleging that the law firm failed to properly draft an agreement and side letter and as a result, its client had to pay its investment advisor $10 million instead of $2 million in a dispute over fees earned in an acquisition. Red Zone v. Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft1

Cadwalader had drafted an agreement and side letter on behalf of Red Zone LLC, a private equity firm, with Red Zone’s investment advisor UBS Securities LLC concerning UBS’s fees in Red Zone’s successful takeover of Six Flags, Inc., owner and operator of multiple amusement parks. The side agreement was intended to modify the agreement’s terms concerning UBS’s fees. UBS commenced an action against Red Zone after Red Zone maintained UBS had earned only a $2 million consulting fee, and not the full $10 million addressed in the engagement agreement.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]