For decades, New York has permitted individuals convicted of murder, but determined insane, to recover inheritance from their victims. based on their moral innocence. A case last year in Nassau County, however, has challenged that notion. The court in In Re Demesyeux, 978 N.Y.S.2d 608, has denied a mother who killed her three children from recovering funds from her children’s estate. The mother was not convicted of murder because the court found that she was mentally ill and therefore not guilty. Last month, the Kings County Surrogate’s Court called the Nassau court’s finding “a clear departure from existing law.” Estate of George J. Ledson, NYLJ, July 9, 2014.

This article examines approaches taken around the country to the question of denying inheritance rights to wrongdoers who are mentally incompetent. In New York, case law has addressed inheritance issues in murder cases and in specific instances of insanity (see for example, Riggs v. Palmer, 115 NY 506 (1889); Re Fitzsimmon’s Estate, 64 Misc.2d 622, 315 NYS2d 590 (1970); Re Bobula’s Estate, 19 NY2d 818 (1967); and Re Eckhard’s Estate, 184 Misc. 748, 757, 54 NYS2d 484, 492 (1945)).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]