Two common criticisms of investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission have been the length of time investigations take and the enormous costs they impose on private parties. The issues raised by those criticisms have grown in significance in recent years as the SEC staff has used vague and overbroad subpoenas and requests for documents in the age of email and electronically stored information. Unduly broad requests for electronic documents slow the production process, extend investigations, and significantly increase the associated costs.
Without sacrificing enforcement goals, the staff of the Division of Enforcement could use narrower, more specifically tailored document requests, which would speed up investigations, allow the agency to allocate its resources more efficiently, reduce costs for recipients of the requests, and treat those recipients more fairly. As a bonus, more limited document requests would be far more likely to satisfy the legal requirements governing the validity of administrative subpoenas. The purpose of this article is to discuss these issues.
Broad Subpoenas
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
