Applying a formula devised by the U.S. Supreme Court that “seems akin to piloting a small craft to safe harbor in a Nor’easter,” a federal judge in Brooklyn has set restitution at $2,000 for a victim of child pornography.
Eastern District Judge Eric Vitaliano (See Profile), in U.S. v. Robert DiLeo, 12 CR 260, rejected the $152,500 restitution demand of “Vicky,” a pseudonym for the victim.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
