A group of Greenwich Village residents, historic preservationists and neighborhood activists have filed an appeal challenging an Appellate Division, First Department, decision allowing New York University to proceed with a $6 billion expansion plan.

The appeals panel’s decision overturned a lower court decision in Glick v. Harvey, 103844/12, that found three parcels of land on which NYU wished to build were “implied” parkland and entitled to protection. The city parks department’s maintenance of the land was “temporary and provisional,” the panel wrote.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]