The decision People v. Hamilton1 is the first by an appellate court in New York to hold that a defendant might vacate his conviction if he could demonstrate that he was “actually innocent” of the crime of which he was convicted. Trial courts throughout the state are entertaining numerous “actual innocence” motions inspired by Hamilton.

‘People v. Hamilton’

The defendant Derrick Hamilton was convicted in 1993 of a 1991 murder. The key prosecution witness was the victim’s girlfriend, and although the defendant submitted a notice of alibi naming two witnesses, neither testified at the trial.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]