Within the dense and complex Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) are significant provisions that are intended to incentivize health care providers to furnish better quality care at lower costs, and conversely, to penalize providers for poor quality care or care that was not medically necessary. The problems of poor quality or unnecessary care were caused, in part, by the fee-for-service payment system that was in effect for generations. The fee-for-service model unfortunately offered the wrong incentives to dishonest or poor quality providers to maximize revenue by maximizing services regardless of the quality or the medical necessity of the services provided.
As our payment systems have moved away from the fee-for-service model, however, a kind of Catch-22 has developed whereby certain types of incentive payments and business arrangements that would improve the quality of care and provide needed assistance to indigent patients could actually run afoul of the federal fraud and abuse laws, including the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS),1 and potentially trigger their drastic penalties.
Anti-Kickback Statute
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
