Disputes over e-discovery are ubiquitous in modern complex litigation. Many times, these disputes are rooted in allegations that a party attempted to frustrate production by withholding evidence or inappropriately asserting privileges to prevent disclosure of relevant materials. Less often do these disputes focus on the sufficiency of the processes used by a party to identify relevant documents.1
This may be due, in part, to the fact that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not prescribe the processes that a party must use to identify relevant materials.2 While courts have interpreted Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to require parties to “undertake reasonable efforts to identify and produce responsive, non-privileged material in [their] possession, custody, or control,”3 the Rule does not set forth specific guidelines or requirements for how a party must conduct its searches to produce these materials.4
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
