A multimillion-dollar malpractice claim against the law firm Blank Rome can go forward, the Appellate Division, First Department, ruled Tuesday.
A unanimous panel affirmed Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Anil Singh’s ruling in Armstrong v. Blank Rome LLP, 651881/13, that denied Blank Rome’s motion to dismiss the claim under Judiciary Law §487, which carries treble damages. It also declined to dismiss claims the firm called “scandalous.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
