Two men who were spared criminal insider trading charges under the Second Circuit’s 2014 ruling in United States v. Newman will face a civil enforcement action after a federal judge found a lower level of intent, recklessness, was enough to sustain charges by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Daryl Payton and Benjamin Durant, accused of trading inside information on an IBM acquisition in 2009, had criminal charges against them dismissed in February because of the circuit’s ruling in Newman (NYLJ, Dec. 11, 2014; Jan. 26, 2015).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]