Asserting breaches of contract and fiduciary duty, as well as theft of trade secrets, Rynone Manufacturing Corp. claimed that its competitor Virginia Marble Manufacturers Inc. and HSB Stone Corp. acted in a nature calculated to interfere with Rynone’s business relationship with NVR Inc. HSB Stone and Virginia Marble allegedly interfered with that relationship through HSB’s disclosure of Rynone’s proprietary information to Virginia Marble, thus enabling Virginia Marble to sell products to NVR Inc. causing Rynone to lose significant revenue. Granting defendants’ motion the court dismissed Rynone’s complaint for failure to state a claim. The court found the accusations in Rynone’s complaint unsupported. Further, all of Rynone’s claims failed because of their reliance on the disclosure allegation, which was impermissibly speculative due to Rynone’s lack of facts specific to that allegation. The complaint’s lack of any details as to the “who, where, when, or how” was its lack of facts as to why the court should believe that the disclosure ever occurred. Nor did Rynone describe how it made—or why the court should make—the logical leap from the loss of its business to the loss of its proprietary information.
Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo