SEAN MURPHY res, v. EAGLE SCAFFOLDING, INC., DEFENDANT THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF/SECOND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-res; KEYSPAN ENERGY CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-ap; KEYSPAN GENERATION, SECOND THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTres-res

SEAN MURPHY res, v. EAGLE SCAFFOLDING, INC., DEFENDANT THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF/SECOND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-res; KEYSPAN ENERGY CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-ap; KEYSPAN GENERATION, SECOND THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTres-res — (INDEX NO. 27573/03)In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant third-party plaintiff/second third-party plaintiff, Eagle Scaffolding, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated March 28, 2013, as denied those branches of its motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action to recover damages for common-law negligence and on the causes of action in the third-party complaint and the second third-party complaint for contractual indemnification, and the third-party defendant and the second third-party defendant cross-appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of the same order as denied those branches of their cross motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action in the third-party complaint and the second third-party complaint for contractual indemnification.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

SEAN MURPHY res, v. EAGLE SCAFFOLDING, INC., DEFENDANT THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF/SECOND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-res; KEYSPAN ENERGY CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-ap; KEYSPAN GENERATION, SECOND THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTres-res — (INDEX NO. 27573/03)In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant third-party plaintiff/second third-party plaintiff, Eagle Scaffolding, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated March 28, 2013, as denied those branches of its motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action to recover damages for common-law negligence and on the causes of action in the third-party complaint and the second third-party complaint for contractual indemnification, and the third-party defendant and the second third-party defendant cross-appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of the same order as denied those branches of their cross motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action in the third-party complaint and the second third-party complaint for contractual indemnification.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the plaintiffs by Eagle Scaffolding, Inc.

SEAN MURPHY res, v. EAGLE SCAFFOLDING, INC., DEFENDANT THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF/SECOND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-res; KEYSPAN ENERGY CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-ap; KEYSPAN GENERATION, SECOND THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTres-res

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal