A man convicted of robbery should get a new trial because a judge responded to a jury note without first presenting it to the defense and prosecution and giving them a chance to respond, an appellate court ruled.
Andre S. Brown, 30, was convicted in 2010 of first-degree robbery, two counts of second-degree robbery, fifth-degree criminal possession of stolen property and fourth-degree criminal possession of a weapon for his role in a Queens knifepoint robbery in 2007.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
