Landlord-Tenant—NYCHA Dismissed Petitioner’s Family Member’s Succession Claim Because Petitioner Was Not Current In Use and Occupancy (U&O)—NYCHA’s U&O Violated Petitioner’s Due Process Rights and Was Arbitrary and Capricious—Due Process Hearing Cannot Be Conditioned On the Payment Of An “Unaffordable Sum”—Informal Settlement Meeting is Not Due Process Hearing
THE PETITIONER ALLEGEDLY lived in her grandmother’s NYC Housing Authority (NYCHA) apartment for nine years and her child has never lived elsewhere. The petitioner sought to reverse NYCHA’s decision “dismissing her remaining family member grievance on the basis that she was not current in use and occupancy [U&O].”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
