One of the hardest questions a lawyer gets from a client is also one of the most common: “Should I sue?” The answer may have surprisingly little to do with the merits of the potential action. No matter how good a legal claim may be, the likely outcome has to be discounted by the costs of securing it. Clients often point out that their legal rights are merely symbolic if they cannot be enforced. But when enforcement means going to court (or at least threatening it) the costs can be substantial. Litigation can be disruptive, unpredictable, expensive and even emotionally draining. If those costs are not offset by the probable award, what is the legal right really worth? Maybe not much.
Different areas of the law deal with this problem in different ways. In some cases, for example, the government may step in with regulation to protect rights that would be too expensive to enforce through private litigation. In others, class or collective actions can spread the costs of enforcement among multiple plaintiffs. But the intellectual property laws—including the copyright, patent and trademark acts—deal with the problem in another way: through fee shifting.1
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
