Governmental entities have a nondelegable duty to provide safe roadways. This duty carries with it a number of important obligations including that the roadway be constructed in a proper fashion; that hazards that become evident over time be addressed; and that, in certain circumstances, the road be reconstructed altogether to take account of evolving design standards. Personal injury cases arising from defective or unsafe roadways can present complicated legal and factual issues. In this column, we discuss several of the most common legal issues that arise in roadway cases.
Qualified Immunity
One of the most significant questions in a roadway defect case will be whether the governmental entity can assert a defense of qualified immunity. This defense may apply if a roadway was designed, or a traffic plan was instituted, through an exercise of reasoned discretion, and after specific consideration of the safety concerns presented by the plaintiff’s case. If qualified immunity applies, a court may defer to the government’s safety decision-making analysis, unless it was objectively unreasonable.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
