Finder Fees Distinguished From Real Estate Brokerage Fees—Lack of a Continuing Causal Connection Between Plaintiff’s Involvement in 2007 and Eventual Sale in 2011, Precludes Plaintiff’s Claim for a Finder’s Fee
The plaintiff had commenced an action to recover a finder’s fee related to a 2011 sale of a building. The complaint asserted claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment and promissory estoppel. The defendants had moved to dismiss, which had previously been denied. After completion of discovery, the parties moved for summary judgment. The plaintiff also sought to amend its complaint to assert a claim for quantum meruit. The court, inter alia, granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
