The statute of limitations for legal malpractice is three years after the alleged malpractice occurs, not when the client becomes aware of the malpractice. The statute may be tolled if the malpractice relates to the contested matter or transaction in issue and the doctrine of “continuous representation” applies. The statute will not be tolled if the law firm continued to only generally represent the client. Certain actions attempting to rectify the malpractice may be held to be continuous representation.

Two Appellate Division courts have recently addressed whether the law firm’s alleged continuous representation tolled the statute of limitations in three different high-stakes actions.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]