An article published in this column nearly 20 years ago discussed the Seventh Circuit’s decision in In re Penrod and similar decisions addressing the circumstances under which a prepetition lien may survive confirmation of a chapter 11 plan.1 In Penrod, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that a prepetition lien can be extinguished through a chapter 11 plan only where the underlying property is “dealt with” under the plan and the secured creditor both receives notice of the plan and participates in some fashion in the reorganization process.2 As noted in our prior article, the Penrod decision is “ambiguous as to what participation in the reorganization means.” This ambiguity has continued to perplex both bankruptcy courts and practitioners in the 20 years since the decision was issued.3

Recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit adopted the Seventh Circuit’s reasoning in Penrod when presented with a similar set of facts in In re Northern New England Telephone Operations.4 This decision is discussed in detail below, along with an overview of the relevant Bankruptcy Code provisions and our thoughts on best practices for secured lenders in light of these decisions.

Relevant Provisions

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]