Landlord—Tenant—Rent Stabilization—Contrary to a Landlord’s Claim, Evidence Did Not Demonstrate That Alterations Caused “Lasting Or Permanent Injury To the Premises”—A “Meaningful Cure” Was Not Possible—Tenant Was Entitled to Opportunity to Cure—RPAPL 753(4)
ALTHOUGH A TRIAL COURT determined that a tenant had breached the “no alterations” clause of a lease by making “alterations to his bathroom, which included the removal of the sink, toilet, medicine cabinet and a wall,” the landlord appealed to the Appellate Term with respect to whether the tenant had a right to cure the breach pursuant to RPAPL 753 (4).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
