A fundamental tenet of appellate jurisprudence is that only an aggrieved party may appeal.1 Aggrievement requires, inter alia, an adjudication against rights, person, or property,2 which arises when a party has petitioned for relief that is denied in whole or in part.3 CPLR 5511 requires that an aggrieved appellant be a “party or a person substituted for him.” But who is aggrieved in the event of an improper custody award? The answer is that, while the child is not a captioned party to the action, an improper custody award means that the court has not fulfilled its charge of parens patriae to secure the child’s best interests, with the child enduring the consequences.
This article addresses the question of the appealability of a child custody judgment or order where the court has granted the prevailing party, assume the mother, custody of the child precisely as she demanded in her complaint or petition. However, now distanced in time from the furor of the trial, the mother realizes that, based on the evidence and the testimony, the child’s best interests will not be best or fully served by the relief that she had requested and received.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
