Index 652183/13 Theodore F. Schroeder, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents, v. Pinterest Inc., Defendant-Respondent, Brian S. Cohen, et al., Defendants-Respondents-Appellants

15110-15111-15112. Index 652183/13 Theodore F. Schroeder, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents, v. Pinterest Inc., Defendant-Respondent, Brian S. Cohen, et al., Defendants-Respondents-Appellants. — Cross appeals by plaintiffs and defendants Brian S. Cohen and New York Angels, Inc. from the judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Melvin L. Schweitzer, J.), entered July 29, 2014, and from the order, same court and Justice, entered July 25, 2014, and appeal by plaintiffs from the order, same court and Justice, entered July 11, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant Pinterest's motion to dismiss the complaint as against it, and granted the Cohen defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint to the extent of dismissing the causes of action for misappropriation of trade secrets/ideas and breach of fiduciary duty, and denied the motion as to the causes of action for misappropriation of skills and expenditures and promissory estoppel.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

15110-15111-15112. Index 652183/13 Theodore F. Schroeder, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents, v. Pinterest Inc., Defendant-Respondent, Brian S. Cohen, et al., Defendants-Respondents-Appellants. — Cross appeals by plaintiffs and defendants Brian S. Cohen and New York Angels, Inc. from the judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Melvin L. Schweitzer, J.), entered July 29, 2014, and from the order, same court and Justice, entered July 25, 2014, and appeal by plaintiffs from the order, same court and Justice, entered July 11, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant Pinterest’s motion to dismiss the complaint as against it, and granted the Cohen defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint to the extent of dismissing the causes of action for misappropriation of trade secrets/ideas and breach of fiduciary duty, and denied the motion as to the causes of action for misappropriation of skills and expenditures and promissory estoppel.

Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads, LLP, New York (Sidney S. Liebesman, Richard L. Scheff, Charles Palella and Steven Pachman of counsel), for appellants-respondents.

Index 652183/13 Theodore F. Schroeder, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents, v. Pinterest Inc., Defendant-Respondent, Brian S. Cohen, et al., Defendants-Respondents-Appellants

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal