A unanimous panel of the Appellate Division, First Department adopted a pro-investor interpretation of key contract provisions common to a slew of state-law residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) cases.
Justice John Sweeny, Jr., writing for the court, applied reasoning from several federal cases that considered the scope of remedies available to investors who lost billions in the 2008 recession when mortgage-backed securities plummeted in value.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
