A federal judge has rejected the latest appeal from New York state officials who are being sued for imposing parole terms of post-release supervision after a court found the practice unconstitutional.
Four years into the case, with a December trial looming on damages in the class action against correctional and parole officials, Southern District Judge Shira Scheindlin called their appeal seeking qualified immunity “frivolous” and said she would retain jurisdiction to keep the case moving.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
