Diversity in the federal judiciary was virtually nonexistent in 1967. Up to that time, only five blacks had ever been appointed to Article III judgeships. The big break with the past occurred when President Lyndon Johnson nominated Thurgood Marshall to the U.S. Supreme Court in June 1967. Wil Haygood has written a compelling book about Marshall’s tumultuous confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee, the first such extended hearings in history. It is a measured if sometimes flawed account of how Marshall’s appointment changed the legal profession and the country.

Although Marshall’s nomination was widely celebrated at the time as a bold and progressive gesture, it was met with derision in the South, where Marshall had won dozens of civil rights victories for blacks since the 1930s. As explained by the author, no one felt this derision quite so personally as the five segregationist senators who dominated the Judiciary Committee, including Chairman James Eastland of Mississippi, John McClellan of Arkansas, Sam Ervin of North Carolina, Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, and Robert Byrd of West Virginia. As the confirmation hearing got underway, this quintet determinately threw down the gauntlet.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]