Commercial Landlord-Tenant—Court Dismisses Article 78 Proceeding Brought by Concessioner to Annul a County’s Decision to Terminate a License Agreement—Petitioner Renovated the Space With the County’s Knowledge—Court Rejected Misrepresentation, Negligent Misrepresentation Unjust Enrichment and Estoppel Claims
A petitioner commenced an Article 78 proceeding, seeking to annul a determination by the respondent county (county), to terminate the license agreement (license) between the parties in “directing the county to renew the license…, or in the alternative, to direct the county to vacate its acceptance of any other proposal for the operation of the subject premises” (premises) and “to accept the proposal of petitioner.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
