We report on important decisions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that (i) invalidated the Lanham Act’s preclusion of disparaging marks; (ii) held that the International Trade Commission lacks jurisdiction over cases involving “intangible” goods; (iii) confirmed the constitutionality of the inter partes review provisions of the America Invents Act; and (iv) defined the scope of infringement liability for products manufactured abroad.
Anti-Disparagement
Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act precludes registration of “scandalous, immoral, or disparaging marks.” See In re Tam, No. 2014-1203, 2015 WL 9287035, at *4 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 22, 2015) (Tam II) (citing 19 U.S.C. §1052(a)). Where a proposed mark references a group of people, the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) has refused to register the mark if it concludes that a substantial composite of that group would find the mark disparaging. See id. at *4. Although the statutory provision is not new, it saw only infrequent use until relatively recently.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
