Imagine this familiar mediation scenario: Plaintiff makes an initial demand of $2 million. Defendant counters with $50,000, to which plaintiff responds by moving to $1.6 million. Defendant then moves to $95,000, and plaintiff responds with $1.4 million. It is now 3 p.m. After six hours of negotiating, the parties are tired and frustrated and appear to be at an impasse.

Plaintiff thinks it has shown flexibility and a willingness to compromise, and is disappointed that defendant will not put “real money” on the table. Defendant, however, sees the negotiation quite differently. It thinks the $2 million demand was “completely unrealistic,” and that plaintiff’s movement to $1.4 million, which is still “way too high,” shows only that plaintiff is “unwilling to accept reality.” Defendant, after much prodding from the mediator, reluctantly agrees to move to $125,000 but says that, if plaintiff does not respond with a “legitimate number,” the mediation is over. Upon hearing defendant’s last move, plaintiff tells the mediator it is time to call it quits.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]