Land Use—Court Denied Motion to Disqualify Lawyer on Grounds That He and His Law Firm Represented Both the Property Owner and a Village in Litigation—Neither Formal Nor Informal Attorney-Client Relationship Existed—Failure to Show Confidential Information Had Been Disclosed, the Advocate-Witness Rule Would Be Violated or Trial Would Be Tainted
This case arose from an alleged breach of two settlement agreements (agreements) between the plaintiff owner (owner) of real property (property) and a village and its board of trustees (village) on one side and third parties on the other.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
