A federal judge will not refer for a possible perjury prosecution a man whose plea allocution in an insider trading criminal case contradicted his testimony in a parallel civil proceeding.
Southern District Judge Jed Rakoff Tuesday, while citing the “glaring inconsistencies” in the in-court statements of defendant Daryl Payton, stopped short of referring the matter to federal prosecutors to investigate Payton for perjury.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
