A judge improperly dismissed indictments against a woman for manslaughter and two other charges for her alleged failure to get help after a teen suffered a drug overdose in her home, a state appeals court determined.
Lewis County Court Judge Daniel King used an incorrect legal sufficiency analysis when he dismissed the most serious charges returned by a grand jury against defendant Brenda Roth, an Appellate Division, Fourth Department, panel ruled in People v. Roth, 15-01259.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
