We report on two Supreme Court decisions emphasizing the district courts’ discretion in awarding enhanced damages in patent cases and attorney fees in copyright cases; a Supreme Court decision upholding the Patent and Trademark Office’s standard of review in inter partes review proceedings; and a Second Circuit decision discussing nominative trademark fair use.
Patent: Enhanced Damages
The Patent Act provides that “the court may increase the damages up to three times the amount found or assessed,” 35 U.S.C. §284, a provision that has long been held to require a finding that the infringer acted willfully. In 2007, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit set forth a two-part test for determining willfulness, requiring a patentee to show by clear and convincing evidence that: (1) “the infringer acted despite an objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted infringement,” and (2) that “this objectively-defined risk…was either known or so obvious that it should have been known to the accused infringer.” In re Seagate Technology, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2007).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
