The quintessential responsibility of shareholders to a corporation is to vote at annual meetings or to approve significant transactions, such as a proposed merger. In many ways, the most important vote cast by a shareholder is when the corporation requires consent to take an action. Of course, unanimous consent is not required and, thus, corporate action will be taken over the objection of some shareholders. In that case, it is important for corporations to remember that dissenting shareholders may assert appraisal rights wherein a court will decide the “fair value” of the shares of those shareholders. Thus, although the transaction at issue has “closed,” potentially there is still work to be done to defend against an appraisal suit.

Recently, Delaware corporations have experienced an increase in appraisal actions. They have become a favored tool of activist shareholders who believe their shares have been undervalued in a merger transaction. Given the success that shareholders have had enforcing their appraisal rights in Delaware courts, New York-based companies may also be targeted for appraisal actions.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]