KRZYSZTOF KARWOWSKI, res, v. GROLIER CLUB OF CITY OF NEW YORK, ap

KRZYSZTOF KARWOWSKI, res, v. GROLIER CLUB OF CITY OF NEW YORK, ap — (INDEX NO. 27024/09) In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated December 8, 2014, as granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law §240(1), and as denied those branches of its cross motion which were for summary judgment dismissing that cause of action and so much of the Labor Law §241(6) cause of action as was based upon alleged violations of 12 NYCRR 23-1.15, 23-1.16, 23-5.1(a), (c)-(k), 23-5.3(e), (g), 23-5.4, 23-5.5, 23-5.6, 23-5.13(d), and 23-5.18(a)-(i).

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

KRZYSZTOF KARWOWSKI, res, v. GROLIER CLUB OF CITY OF NEW YORK, ap — (INDEX NO. 27024/09) In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated December 8, 2014, as granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law §240(1), and as denied those branches of its cross motion which were for summary judgment dismissing that cause of action and so much of the Labor Law §241(6) cause of action as was based upon alleged violations of 12 NYCRR 23-1.15, 23-1.16, 23-5.1(a), (c)-(k), 23-5.3(e), (g), 23-5.4, 23-5.5, 23-5.6, 23-5.13(d), and 23-5.18(a)-(i).

ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, (1) by deleting the provision thereof granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law §240(1), and substituting therefor a provision denying that motion, and (2) by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the defendant’s cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing so much of the Labor Law §241(6) cause of action as was based upon alleged violations of 12 NYCRR 23-1.15, 23-1.16, 23-5.1(a), (c)-(k), 23-5.3(e), (g), 23-5.4, 23-5.5, 23-5.6, 23-5.13(d), and 23-5.18(a)-(d), (f), (i), and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the cross motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

KRZYSZTOF KARWOWSKI, res, v. GROLIER CLUB OF CITY OF NEW YORK, ap

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal