Prosecutors are now appealing the suppression of wiretap evidence by a judge who said a federal agent perjured himself on a wiretap application.
In a narcotics gang prosecution using GPS data gleaned from a paroled defendant’s electronic monitoring bracelet, Eastern District Judge Jack Weinstein said a Homeland Security Investigations agent wrongly swore in a 2015 affidavit there had been no prior wiretaps on targets in the investigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
