Construction and Development Disputes—Atlantic Yards Project in Brooklyn—Lien Law §5—Private Developer on Public Land Must Post a Bond or Other Undertaking Guaranteeing Prompt Payment to Contractor—Piercing the Corporate Veil—Breach of Contract—Attorney Disqualification
This decision involved the Appellate Division, First Department’s interpretation of “the language of Lien Law §5, which provides that a private developer on public land must post a bond or other undertaking guaranteeing prompt payment to the contractor.” The decision also addressed issues involving “piercing the corporate veil,” breach of contract and disqualification of counsel.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
