SHERYL R. MENKES, plf-ap, v. RICHARD DELIKAT, ETC. def-res

3335. SHERYL R. MENKES, plf-ap, v. RICHARD DELIKAT, ETC. def-res — SHERYL R. MENKES, APPELLANT PRO SE. Law Offices of Jonathan D. Shramko, New York (Jonathan D. Shramko of counsel), for res — Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Wooten, J.), entered October 16, 2015, which, to the extent appealable, denied plaintiff’s motion to renew, and thereupon vacate, a prior order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126 based on plaintiff’s failure to comply with discovery orders, unanimously affirmed, and the appeal therefrom otherwise dismissed, as taken from a nonappealable order, without costs.

No appeal lies from the portion of the order that denied reargument (Jones v. 170 E. 92nd St. Owners Corp., 69 AD3d 483 [1st Dept 2010]; see CPLR 5701[a][2][viii]). Thus, plaintiff’s arguments that the motion court misapprehended the law or facts when it granted defendants’ motion and denied her cross motion are not properly before this Court (see Stratakis v. Ryjov, 66 AD3d 411 [1st Dept 2009]; CPLR 2221[d][2]).