AARON ELKIN, plf-ap, v. ANDREA LABIS, def-res

3372-3374. AARON ELKIN, plf-ap, v. ANDREA LABIS, def-res — AARON ELKIN, M.D., APPELLANT PRO SE. Char & Herzberg, LLP, New York (Edward M. Char of counsel), for res — Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen Gesmer, J.), entered April 23, 2015, which, among other things, denied plaintiff father’s motion to hold defendant mother in contempt, and granted so much of defendant’s cross motion as sought counsel fees to the extent of ordering plaintiff to pay to defendant’s attorneys the sum of $2000; and order, same court and Justice, entered April 28, 2015, which, among other things, granted plaintiff’s motion for an order directing certain relief only to the extent of appointing, in an order entered April 29, 2015, Dr. Jo Hariton to conduct therapeutic visits between plaintiff and the parties’ child, and otherwise denied the motion; and order, same court and Justice, entered April 29, 2015, which, among other things, directed plaintiff to arrange six therapeutic visits between him and the child with Dr. Hariton, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to establish any basis for the motion court to order defendant to bring the child to the courtroom (Domestic Relations Law §70). Nor did plaintiff establish any change in circumstance warranting the reassessment or updating of the parenting plan (Matter of Moore v. Gonzalez, 134 AD3d 718, 719 [2d Dept 2015]). An evidentiary hearing was not required (see e.g. Allen v. Farrow, 215 AD2d 137, 140 [1st Dept 1995]).