DEBORAH KELLERGOLDMAN, plf-res, v. JACOB GOLDMAN, def-ap

2260-2261. DEBORAH KELLERGOLDMAN, plf-res, v. JACOB GOLDMAN, def-ap — Kanfer & Holtzer, New York (Mark M. Holtzer of counsel), for ap — Martin Friedlander, PC, New York (Martin E. Friedlander of counsel), for res — Judgment of divorce, Supreme Court, New York County (Matthew F. Cooper, J.), entered October 15, 2015, to the extent appealed from, adhering to the court's interpretation that there was a cap on the "room and board" credit provision of the parties' Stipulation of Settlement and Agreement in its August 19, 2015 order, affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered August 19, 2015, which granted plaintiff's motion to the extent of interpreting the parties' agreement as providing a cap on defendant's credit against his child support obligations, dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

2260-2261. DEBORAH KELLERGOLDMAN, plf-res, v. JACOB GOLDMAN, def-ap — Kanfer & Holtzer, New York (Mark M. Holtzer of counsel), for ap — Martin Friedlander, PC, New York (Martin E. Friedlander of counsel), for res — Judgment of divorce, Supreme Court, New York County (Matthew F. Cooper, J.), entered October 15, 2015, to the extent appealed from, adhering to the court’s interpretation that there was a cap on the “room and board” credit provision of the parties’ Stipulation of Settlement and Agreement in its August 19, 2015 order, affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered August 19, 2015, which granted plaintiff’s motion to the extent of interpreting the parties’ agreement as providing a cap on defendant’s credit against his child support obligations, dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

The parties entered into a Stipulation of Settlement and Agreement (the agreement) that resolved all issues surrounding their separation. Although they had four unemancipated children, the agreement only provided for support for the three children for whom plaintiff mother was the custodial parent. Defendant father retained custody of the fourth child, but agreed to receive no support for him from the mother. Had the parties not negotiated the issue of child support, the mother stood to collect $5,000 per month in child support payments, pursuant to the Child Support Standards Act, a fact acknowledged by the agreement. Instead, she agreed to monthly child support payments of $2,500.

DEBORAH KELLERGOLDMAN, plf-res, v. JACOB GOLDMAN, def-ap

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal