ANTHONY BARRETT, plf, v. MAGNETIC CONSTRUCTION GROUP CORP., DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-res, NOMAD HOTELS, LLC DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS def; MJE, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS MJE CONTRACTING, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-res-res

ANTHONY BARRETT, plf, v. MAGNETIC CONSTRUCTION GROUP CORP., DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-res, NOMAD HOTELS, LLC DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS def; MJE, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS MJE CONTRACTING, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-res-res — (INDEX NO. 8348/11)Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernadette Bayne, J.), dated April 30, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that branch of the motion of the defendant/third-party plaintiff and the defendants Nomad Hotels, LLC, GFI 1170 Broadway, LLC, GFI Capital Resources Group, Inc., and GFI Hotel Company, LLC, which was for summary judgment on the third-party cause of action for contractual indemnification and, insofar as crossappealed from, denied the third-party defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

ANTHONY BARRETT, plf, v. MAGNETIC CONSTRUCTION GROUP CORP., DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-res, NOMAD HOTELS, LLC DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS def; MJE, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS MJE CONTRACTING, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-res-res — (INDEX NO. 8348/11)Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernadette Bayne, J.), dated April 30, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that branch of the motion of the defendant/third-party plaintiff and the defendants Nomad Hotels, LLC, GFI 1170 Broadway, LLC, GFI Capital Resources Group, Inc., and GFI Hotel Company, LLC, which was for summary judgment on the third-party cause of action for contractual indemnification and, insofar as crossappealed from, denied the third-party defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint.

ORDERED that the appeal by the defendants GFI Development Company, LLC, 1170 Broadway Associates, LLC, and the Haddad Organization, Ltd., is dismissed, as those defendants are not aggrieved by the order appealed from; and it is further,

ANTHONY BARRETT, plf, v. MAGNETIC CONSTRUCTION GROUP CORP., DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-res, NOMAD HOTELS, LLC DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS def; MJE, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS MJE CONTRACTING, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-res-res

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal