SAVIOR GRECH, plf, v. HRC CORPORATION DEFENDANTS THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-ap; MURRAY HILL OFFICE MAINTENANCE, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-res

SAVIOR GRECH, plf, v. HRC CORPORATION DEFENDANTS THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-ap; MURRAY HILL OFFICE MAINTENANCE, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-res — (INDEX NO. 12616/06)In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants third-party plaintiffs appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Elliot, J.), entered January 28, 2015, which granted the third-party defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, and (2), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court entered July 13, 2015, as denied that branch of their motion which was for leave to renew their opposition to the third-party defendant's motion for summary judgment and, in effect, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination in the order entered January 28, 2015.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

SAVIOR GRECH, plf, v. HRC CORPORATION DEFENDANTS THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-ap; MURRAY HILL OFFICE MAINTENANCE, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-res — (INDEX NO. 12616/06)In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants third-party plaintiffs appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Elliot, J.), entered January 28, 2015, which granted the third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, and (2), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court entered July 13, 2015, as denied that branch of their motion which was for leave to renew their opposition to the third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment and, in effect, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination in the order entered January 28, 2015.

ORDERED that the appeal from the order entered January 28, 2015, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by so much of the order entered July 13, 2015, as was made upon reargument; and it is further,

SAVIOR GRECH, plf, v. HRC CORPORATION DEFENDANTS THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-ap; MURRAY HILL OFFICE MAINTENANCE, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-res

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal