In the Matter of Arbitration Between City of Buffalo v. Brand-On Services, Inc.
May 05, 2017 at 12:00 AM
X
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Freid and Klawon, Williamsville (Adam B. Conners of Counsel), for Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellant.Timothy A. Ball, Corporation Counsel, Buffalo (David M. Lee of Counsel), for Petitioner-Respondent.Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), entered January 11, 2016. The judgment granted petitioner’s motion to dismiss the complaint of intervenor-plaintiff Morton H. Wittlin.It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.Memorandum: Intervenor-plaintiff Morton H. Wittlin commenced this action against petitioner, the City of Buffalo (City), seeking a declaration that he has a valid security interest in certain floating docks in the Erie Basin Marina. The City moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) for failure to state a cause of action and for a declaration that ownership of the floating docks is free and clear of any right or interest possessed by Wittlin. Supreme Court granted the City’s motion, dismissed the complaint, and made the declaration sought by the City.As a preliminary matter, we note that because this is a declaratory judgment action, the court erred in dismissing the complaint ( see Tumminello v Tumminello, 204 AD2d 1067, 1067; see generally Maurizzio v Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 73 NY2d 951, 954). In any event, we conclude that the court erred in granting the substantive relief sought by the City. Contrary to the City’s view, its evidentiary submissions do not conclusively establish that the City owned the docks in 2009 and that Wittlin does not have a valid security interest in the docks ( see Donald Braasch Constr. Inc. v State Ins. Fund, 98 AD3d 1302, 1302-1304; Pittsford Plaza Co. LP v TLC W. LLC, 45 AD3d 1272, 1273-1274; see generally Fillman v Axel, 63 AD2d 876, 876).
This premium content is reserved exclusively for New York Law Journal subscribers.
With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas. View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team. View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same. View Now
Law.com Compass includes access to our exclusive industry reports, combining the unmatched expertise of our analyst team with ALM’s deep bench of proprietary information to provide insights that can’t be found anywhere else.
Law.com Compass delivers you the full scope of information, from the rankings of the Am Law 200 and NLJ 500 to intricate details and comparisons of firms’ financials, staffing, clients, news and events.
