An employee is provided a computer with email access for the employee’s exclusive use in the course of his or her employment. The employer monitors the employee’s communications and has access to all employees’ computers and email files. If the employee were to make personal use of the employer’s computer by sending and receiving personal email messages through the employee’s assigned email account to and from, for example, the employee’s attorney for purposes of obtaining legal advice or the employee’s spouse concerning marital matters, would those communications be protected by the pertinent privilege? In Peerenboom v. Marvel Entertainment, 148 A.D.3d 531 (2017), the Appellate Division, First Department, addressed this question.
The court held that an employee has no expectation of confidentiality, and thus no privilege protection (attorney-client or spousal) when the employee uses the employer’s monitored email system, provided the employer has adequately warned its employees of the existence of such monitoring. However, attorney work product protection may still be available for those emails. As there are significant takeaways from these holdings, Peerenboom will be the focus of this column.
‘Peerenboom’ Facts
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
