Fifty years ago, on June 12, 1967, the U.S. Supreme Court decided the Wade-Gilbert-Stovall trilogy and expressed its concerns about the possibility and dangers of suggestive identification procedures. U.S. v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967); Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 (1967); Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 (1967). Long before the term “wrongful conviction” became commonplace, the court noted the conclusion by one commentator that “the influence of improper suggestion upon identifying witnesses probably accounts for more miscarriages of justice than any other single factor—perhaps it is responsible for more such errors that all other factors combined.” U.S. v. Wade, 388 at 229 (quoting Patrick Wall, “Eye-Witness Identification in Criminal Cases”).
Fifty years following Wade, New York is about to embark on a new era of eyewitness identification. Effective July 1st, newly enacted legislation will permit evidence that a witness identified the defendant from a photograph provided, however, that a “blind” or “blinded” identification procedure was utilized. In addition, the New York Court of Appeals will decide shortly whether trial courts must include a cross-racial identification charge unless the parties agree that no cross-racial identification has occurred. People v. Boone, 129 A.D.3d 1099 (2d Dept. 2015), leave granted.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]