OPARAJI v. CITIBANK, N.A., D/B/A CITIMORTAGE, INC.

2014-2359 Q C. OPARAJI v. CITIBANK, N.A., D/B/A CITIMORTAGE, INC. — Appeals from orders of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, entered August 18, 2014 (Jodi Orlow, J.), November 28, 2014 (Jodi Orlow, J.) and April 27, 2015 (Sally E. Unger, J.), respectively. The order entered August 18, 2014, insofar as appealed from and as limited by the brief, granted defendant's motion for, in effect, summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as was asserted by plaintiff Maurice Oparaji and denied his motion, in effect, for leave to reargue his prior cross motion to preclude defendant from offering evidence at trial, which cross motion had been denied in an order of the same court (Anna Culley, J.) dated July 16, 2012. The order entered November 28, 2014, insofar as appealed from, denied a motion by plaintiff Maurice Oparaji for leave to reargue his opposition to defendant's prior motion, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as was asserted by him. The order entered April 27, 2015, insofar as appealed from, denied the branch of a motion by plaintiff Maurice Oparaji seeking to compel defendant to produce the note and mortgage signed by plaintiffs, and the cross motion papers that had been submitted to the court on an initial motion that defendant had made for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

2014-2359 Q C. OPARAJI v. CITIBANK, N.A., D/B/A CITIMORTAGE, INC. — Appeals from orders of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, entered August 18, 2014 (Jodi Orlow, J.), November 28, 2014 (Jodi Orlow, J.) and April 27, 2015 (Sally E. Unger, J.), respectively. The order entered August 18, 2014, insofar as appealed from and as limited by the brief, granted defendant’s motion for, in effect, summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as was asserted by plaintiff Maurice Oparaji and denied his motion, in effect, for leave to reargue his prior cross motion to preclude defendant from offering evidence at trial, which cross motion had been denied in an order of the same court (Anna Culley, J.) dated July 16, 2012. The order entered November 28, 2014, insofar as appealed from, denied a motion by plaintiff Maurice Oparaji for leave to reargue his opposition to defendant’s prior motion, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as was asserted by him. The order entered April 27, 2015, insofar as appealed from, denied the branch of a motion by plaintiff Maurice Oparaji seeking to compel defendant to produce the note and mortgage signed by plaintiffs, and the cross motion papers that had been submitted to the court on an initial motion that defendant had made for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that so much of the appeal from the order entered August 18, 2014 as is from the portion thereof that denied plaintiff Maurice Oparaji’s motion, in effect, for leave to reargue his prior cross motion to preclude defendant from offering evidence at trial, and the appeal from the order entered November 28, 2014, are dismissed, as no appeal lies from a denial of reargument; and it is further,

OPARAJI v. CITIBANK, N.A., D/B/A CITIMORTAGE, INC.

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal