OPARAJI v. CITIBANK, N.A., D/B/A CITIMORTAGE, INC.

2015-00485 Q C. OPARAJI v. CITIBANK, N.A., D/B/A CITIMORTAGE, INC. — Appeals from orders of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, entered July 17, 2012 (Anna Culley, J.), August 18, 2014 (Jodi Orlow, J.), November 28, 2014 (Jodi Orlow, J.) and April 27, 2015 (Sally E. Unger, J.), respectively. The order entered July 17, 2012, insofar as appealed from by plaintiff Ada Oparaji, granted on default the branch of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as was asserted by plaintiff Ada Oparaji and denied the branch of a cross motion by plaintiff Maurice Oparaji seeking to preclude defendant from offering certain evidence at trial. The order entered August 18, 2014, insofar as appealed from by plaintiff Ada Oparaji, granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as was asserted by plaintiff Maurice Oparaji and denied so much of a motion as was made by plaintiff Ada Oparaji as sought to preclude defendant from offering certain evidence at trial. The order entered November 28, 2014, insofar as appealed from, denied so much of a motion as was made by plaintiff Ada Oparaji seeking leave to renew and reargue her opposition to defendant's prior motion for summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as was asserted by plaintiff Maurice Oparaji. The order entered April 27, 2015, insofar as appealed from, denied so much of a motion as was made by plaintiff Ada Oparaji seeking to compel defendant to produce certain documents.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

2015-00485 Q C. OPARAJI v. CITIBANK, N.A., D/B/A CITIMORTAGE, INC. — Appeals from orders of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, entered July 17, 2012 (Anna Culley, J.), August 18, 2014 (Jodi Orlow, J.), November 28, 2014 (Jodi Orlow, J.) and April 27, 2015 (Sally E. Unger, J.), respectively. The order entered July 17, 2012, insofar as appealed from by plaintiff Ada Oparaji, granted on default the branch of defendant’s motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as was asserted by plaintiff Ada Oparaji and denied the branch of a cross motion by plaintiff Maurice Oparaji seeking to preclude defendant from offering certain evidence at trial. The order entered August 18, 2014, insofar as appealed from by plaintiff Ada Oparaji, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as was asserted by plaintiff Maurice Oparaji and denied so much of a motion as was made by plaintiff Ada Oparaji as sought to preclude defendant from offering certain evidence at trial. The order entered November 28, 2014, insofar as appealed from, denied so much of a motion as was made by plaintiff Ada Oparaji seeking leave to renew and reargue her opposition to defendant’s prior motion for summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as was asserted by plaintiff Maurice Oparaji. The order entered April 27, 2015, insofar as appealed from, denied so much of a motion as was made by plaintiff Ada Oparaji seeking to compel defendant to produce certain documents.

ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed.

OPARAJI v. CITIBANK, N.A., D/B/A CITIMORTAGE, INC.

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal