ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, plf-res, v. OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, def-ap, INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY, ETC. def

4255. ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, plf-res, v. OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, def-ap, INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY, ETC. def — Harrington, Ocko & Monk, LLP, White Plains (Paul Howansky of counsel), for ap — Gallo Vitucci Klar LLP, New York (Christen Giannaros of counsel), for res — Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo Hagler, J.), entered July 21, 2016, which granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment declaring that defendant Old Republic Insurance Company is obligated, on an equal basis with plaintiff, to defend and indemnify Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc. in the underlying personal injury action, and so declared, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

4255. ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, plf-res, v. OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, def-ap, INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY, ETC. def — Harrington, Ocko & Monk, LLP, White Plains (Paul Howansky of counsel), for ap — Gallo Vitucci Klar LLP, New York (Christen Giannaros of counsel), for res — Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo Hagler, J.), entered July 21, 2016, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment declaring that defendant Old Republic Insurance Company is obligated, on an equal basis with plaintiff, to defend and indemnify Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc. in the underlying personal injury action, and so declared, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The policy’s conflicting selfinsured retention (SIR) clause and private and non-contributory (PNC) endorsement cannot be reconciled as to Bovis, an additional insured. The PNC endorsement, which was added after the effective date of the policy containing the SIR clause and made effective retroactively, is controlling (see Kratzenstein v. Western Assur. Co. of City of Toronto, 116 NY 54, 57-58 [1889]). The clause expressly provides that it “modifies” the relevant coverage to provide to an additional insured “primary insurance on a noncontributory basis” if such coverage is required by the contract between the named insured and the additional insured, as is the case here. The subsequently agreed-to PNC endorsement’s requirement of “primary insurance on a non-contributory basis” is, on its face, inconsistent with, and therefore overrides, the original policy’s $1,000,000 SIR provision. We note that nothing in the contract between Bovis and the named insured supports the conclusion that Bovis consented to a self-insured retention. Indeed, as previously noted, the contract requires that coverage for the additional insured be primary (see Pecker Iron Works of N.Y. v. Traveler’s Ins. Co., 99 NY2d 391 [2003]).

ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, plf-res, v. OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, def-ap, INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY, ETC. def

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal