HSBC BANK, USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE HOLDERS OF THE ELLINGTON LOAN ACQUISITION TRUST 2007-1, ETC., res, v. VISHNU SAWH, APPELLANT def

HSBC BANK, USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE HOLDERS OF THE ELLINGTON LOAN ACQUISITION TRUST 2007-1, ETC., res, v. VISHNU SAWH, APPELLANT def — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay the foreclosure sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered November 4, 2016. By order to show cause dated July 5, 2017, inter alia, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal from the order entered November 4, 2016, on the ground that the right of direct appeal from the order terminated upon entry of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 2, 2017, and the appellant's motion was held in abeyance in the interim. Motion by the appellant, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 5520(c) to deem the notice of appeal from the order to be a premature notice of appeal from the judgment to the extent that the judgment brings up for review the order, to deem the record and the appellant's brief filed in connection with the appeal from the order to be filed in connection with the judgment, and to limit the issues raised on the appeal from the judgment to the issues raised in the briefs filed in connection with the appeal from the order. Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

HSBC BANK, USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE HOLDERS OF THE ELLINGTON LOAN ACQUISITION TRUST 2007-1, ETC., res, v. VISHNU SAWH, APPELLANT def — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay the foreclosure sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered November 4, 2016. By order to show cause dated July 5, 2017, inter alia, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal from the order entered November 4, 2016, on the ground that the right of direct appeal from the order terminated upon entry of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 2, 2017, and the appellant’s motion was held in abeyance in the interim. Motion by the appellant, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 5520(c) to deem the notice of appeal from the order to be a premature notice of appeal from the judgment to the extent that the judgment brings up for review the order, to deem the record and the appellant’s brief filed in connection with the appeal from the order to be filed in connection with the judgment, and to limit the issues raised on the appeal from the judgment to the issues raised in the briefs filed in connection with the appeal from the order. Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.

Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, upon the papers filed in support of the motion, inter alia, to stay the foreclosure sale and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the motion, inter alia, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 5520(c) to deem the notice of appeal from the order to be a premature notice of appeal from the judgment to the extent that the judgment brings up for review the order and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

HSBC BANK, USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE HOLDERS OF THE ELLINGTON LOAN ACQUISITION TRUST 2007-1, ETC., res, v. VISHNU SAWH, APPELLANT def

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal