Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., etc., res, v. Marie Kosen appellants def — Motion by the appellants to stay enforcement of two orders of the Supreme Court, Orange County, both dated March 7, 2016, to stay the referee’s sale of the subject premises, and to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action, pending hearing and determination of appeals from the orders.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal from the orders dated March 7, 2016, on the ground that the right of direct appeal from the orders terminated upon entry in the above-entitled action of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, on February 14, 2017 (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241), by filing an affirmation or an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before April 20, 2018, or, if the appellant be so advised, by making a motion, on or before April 20, 2018, pursuant to CPLR 5520(c) to deem the notice of appeal from the orders to be a premature notice of appeal from the judgment to the extent that the judgment brings up for review the orders, to deem the record and the parties’ briefs filed in connection with the appeal from the orders to be filed in connection with the judgment, and for leave to serve and file a supplemental record containing the judgment; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court or her designee is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties to the appeal by regular mail.LEVENTHAL, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Lisa Cradox, a/k/a Lisa Craddock, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 24, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of Rochelle Carroll, res, v. Jay Brodsky, ap — F-1990-90/99C, F-1990-90/01H) — Appeal by Jay Brodsky from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated March 13, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 30, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Roman, Barros and Christopher, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Sharif Croom, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se to enlarge the time to serve and file a supplemental brief on appeals from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered October 17, 2013, and February 26, 2014, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant’s supplemental brief shall be served and filed on or before June 5, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant shall file nine copies of the supplemental brief and serve one copy on the District Attorney.CHAMBERS, J.P., ROMAN, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.MATTER of Yu Wei, res, v. Robert Mathews, ap — Appeal by Robert Mathews from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (IDV Part), dated January 23, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the child to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 18, 2018.By Chambers, J.P.; Roman, Barros and Christopher, JJ.Arthur Babock ap, v. Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. def, Town of Clarkstown, res — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, July 18, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until April 3, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., ROMAN, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Roman, Barros and Christopher, JJ.Chandra Ramdas, res, v. Siarie Ramdas, ap — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered August 19, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until April 3, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.CHAMBERS, J.P., ROMAN, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.Keybank National Association, etc.,res, v. Sarcar, LLC def, Isaac Zinger, et al., ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated August 14, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Hinds-Radix, JJ.Oxford Health Plans (NY), Inc. ap, v. Biomed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., res — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 16, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until April 5, 2018, and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.Eric Ernst, res, v. Schon Laureen Beechler, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 22, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Chambers, J.P.; Roman, Barros and Christopher, JJ.Charikila Apladendaki res, v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, etc., ap — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until April 18, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., ROMAN, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.MATTER of Lisa Pesco, res, v. Jeffrey Pustai, ap — Appeal by Jeffrey Pustai from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated December 21, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this ; and it is further,ORDERED that the deadline set forth in the second decretal paragraph of the dated February 23, 2018, is extended, and within 30 days after the date of this , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Chambers, J.P.; Roman, Barros and Christopher, JJ.Alen Fox, Jr., etc. ap, v. Dionne Mark def, New York Health Care, Inc. res — Motion by the respondents Jude Jean, Ninel Mayman, and CNR Health Care Network, Inc., to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 12, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the time for the respondents Jude Jean, Ninel Mayman, and CNR Health Care Network, Inc., to serve and file a brief is enlarged until April 18, 2018, and the brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., ROMAN, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Hinds-Radix, JJ.Rena Berger res-ap, v. Katherine Joy Shen, etc. appellants- respondents def — Motion by the respondents-appellants to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal and a cross appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered March 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondents-appellants’ time to serve and file the answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]), is enlarged until April 19, 2018, and the answering brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.By Roman, J.P.; Miller, Lasalle and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Police Officer James Kumano, petitioner/ap, v. Richard Conway respondents/res — Motion by the petitioner/appellant for leave to reargue a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Village of Port Chester Board of Trustees dated April 6, 2015, which was transferred to this Court by an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, and an appeal from stated portions of the same order which were determined by decision, order and judgment of this Court dated November 29, 2017, or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the decision, order and judgment of this Court.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied, with $100 costs.ROMAN, J.P., MILLER, LASALLE and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.By Cohen, J.P.; Maltese, Lasalle and Iannacci, JJ.Cheryl John, appellant-res, v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC, defendant; Deustche Bank Trust Company Americas, etc., intervenor defendant-res-res — Motion by the appellant-respondent on an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 27, 2016, inter alia, for leave to reargue her prior motion to dismiss the cross appeal, which was determined by decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 29, 2017, to disqualify counsel for GMAC Mortgage, LLC, and to direct GMAC Mortgage, LLC, to produce certain documents.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.COHEN, J.P., MALTESE, LASALLE and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Cohen, J.P.; Maltese, Lasalle and Iannacci, JJ.Cheryl John, ap, v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC, defendant; Deustche Bank Trust Company Americas, etc., intervenor def-res — Motion by the appellant on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County dated May 10, 2017, inter alia, to disqualify counsel for GMAC Mortgage, LLC, and to direct GMAC Mortgage, LLC, to produce certain documents.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.COHEN, J.P., MALTESE, LASALLE and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.MATTER of Gina Slavik, ap, v. Glen Deegan, res — Appeal by Gina Slavik from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated November 3, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 23, 2018.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Hinds-Radix, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Deno Williams, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se pursuant to CPL 460.30 for an extension of time to take an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, rendered February 14, 2017, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s moving papers are deemed to constitute a timely notice of appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Yasmin Daley Duncan386 Parkside AvenueBrooklyn, NY 11226and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.Kacie Antoine, plf-res, v. Capital One Equipment Leasing, LLC, etc., def-res, Uniworld Tours, Inc. ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 3, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Annakeara Stinson, res, v. Forrest Muelrath, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Lisa Craddock, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 15, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Cohen, Duffy and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Wells Fargo Bank, etc., plf, v. Lauren Pickett, ap, 39 Pierrepont Condominium, defendant-res, David H. Perlman, etc., nonparty-res — Motion by the appellant to stay the defendant-respondent and the nonparty-respondent or any third party from taking any action with respect to the subject premises, including but not limited to transfer of title or possession, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 13, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that the transfer of title to the subject premises, 39 Pierrepont Street, Unit 1, Brooklyn, New York, is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appeal is perfected on or before April 19, 2018, and the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before April 19, 2018, the Court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, without further notice, or the respondents may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice.MASTRO, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, res, v. Reshonah M. Bennett, ap — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 11, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated March 14, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Cohen, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Linda Avery ap, v. WJM Development Corp. res, et al., def — Motion by the respondent Tom F. Abillama to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 23, 2016. Separate motion by the appellants to enlarge the record to include certain material or for this Court to take judicial notice of that material, and to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion by the respondent Tom F. Abillama and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the appellants’ motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion by the respondent Tom F. Abillama is granted, the time of the respondent Tom F. Abillama to serve and file a brief is enlarged until April 3, 2018, and the brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the appellants’ motion which is to enlarge the record to include certain material or for this Court to take judicial notice of that material is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the appellants’ motion which is to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief is granted, the appellants’ time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until April 18, 2018, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MASTRO, J.P., COHEN, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Cohen, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Christopher Jones, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 16, 2005, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.MASTRO, J.P., COHEN, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Cohen, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Analiese Home Corp., res, v. Joseph Mannari ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellants to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered March 2, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.MASTRO, J.P., COHEN, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Cohen, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, res, v. Sepideh Hosseinipour ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellants on appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 15, 2017, and a judgment of the same court entered August 16, 2017, to stay enforcement of the judgment pending hearing and determination of the appeals.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.MASTRO, J.P., COHEN, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Hinds-Radix, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Nicole L. Smith, ap — Renewed motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered December 5, 2016, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Alex Smith6 North StreetMiddletown, New York 10940and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Cohen, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.MATTER of Scott Mitchell Unger, ap, v. Koren Ha, res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Koren Ha, res, v. Scott Mitchell Unger, ap — (Proceeding No. 2) — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated October 23, 2017, as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers is denied as unnecessary (see Family Ct Act §1116), and the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are to waive the filing fee, for free transcripts, and for the assignment of counsel are denied; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this decision and order on motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), within 30 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4), above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MASTRO, J.P., COHEN, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Sgroi, J.PEOPLE, etc., plf, v. Angel Maldonado, def — Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated September 27, 2017, which has been referred to me for determination.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is denied.By Mastro, J.P.; Cohen, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Devall L. Garner, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se to relieve counsel assigned to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered June 29, 2017, and for the assignment of new counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.MASTRO, J.P., COHEN, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Cohen, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Emma Daniels-Cooke, res, v. Derrick Murray ap — Motion by the appellants to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action, including the trial, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 4, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.MASTRO, J.P., COHEN, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Cohen, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.MATTER of Astoria Atlas Holdings, LLC, et al., pet-res, v. Acropolis Gardens Realty Corp., ap, Metropolitan Pacific Properties, Inc. respondents- res — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay enforcement of certain subpoenas, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 15, 2018.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies as of right from an order that is not the result of a motion made on notice (see CPLR 5701), and leave to appeal has not been granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is denied as academic.MASTRO, J.P., COHEN, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Hinds-Radix, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Darrell Cantie, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se pursuant to CPL 460.30 for an extension of time to take an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 5, 2017, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s moving papers are deemed to constitute a timely notice of appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Hinds-Radix, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Benjamin Manners, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se pursuant to CPL 460.30 for an extension of time to take an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 19, 2017, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s moving papers are deemed to constitute a timely notice of appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip LaisureAppellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Hinds-Radix, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Muhammed Ali, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September 28, 2017, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers, including the appellant’s affidavit setting forth the amount and source of counsel fees paid to retained counsel in the trial court.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Balkin, Austin and Hinds-Radix, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Samuel Olabiya, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, dated July 26, 2016, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers, including the appellant’s affidavit setting forth whether the appellant was represented by assigned counsel or retained counsel in the trial court and, if retained, the amount and source of counsel fees paid to retained counsel.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Miller, Duffy and Lasalle, JJ.JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, res, v. Michelle G. Gershfeld, etc., ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay enforcement of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 28, 2017, and to stay the sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from the order.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., MILLER, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.
