Appellate Division Second Department Motion List released on: March 8, 2018 By Scheinkman, P.J.; Cohen, Duffy and Iannacci, JJ.

US Bank National Association, etc., ap, v. Leah Szoffer respondents def — Motion by the appellant to stay enforcement of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated December 4, 2017, and to stay the respondents from transferring, selling, or otherwise encumbering or causing waste or damage to the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from the order.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied without prejudice to renew upon vacatur or expiration of the notice of pendency concerning the subject premises.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., COHEN, DUFFY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Austin, J.P.; Roman, Miller and Connolly, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jose Mandes, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to serve and file a supplemental reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 13, 2013.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.AUSTIN, J.P., ROMAN, MILLER and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Austin, J.P.; Roman, Miller and Connolly, JJ.Susan Christenson, res, v. Stephen J. Jones, ap — Motion by the respondent, inter alia, to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 11, 2017, on the ground that it has been rendered academic by an order of the same court dated December 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it has been rendered academic is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.AUSTIN, J.P., ROMAN, MILLER and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Austin, J.P.; Roman, Miller and Connolly, JJ.Veeramuthu P. Gounder, plf, v. Progressive Credit Union, def — (Appellate Term Docket No. 2014-1371QC; Civil Court Index No. 19006/16) — Motion by Veeramuthu P. Gounder for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Appellate Term, Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts, dated May 17, 2017, which affirmed an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, entered April 4, 2014.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.AUSTIN, J.P., ROMAN, MILLER and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Austin, J.P.; Roman, Miller and Connolly, JJ.MATTER of Sherry Alayos, etc., ap, v. New York City Office of Child Support Collections Enforcement res — 2016-12628MATTER of Sherry Alayos, etc., appellant,v New York City Office of Child SupportCollections Enforcement respondents.(Index No. 12429/15) ‌Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 29, 2016, and August 4, 2016, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to timely perfect in accordance with the rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]) and prior order of this Court.AUSTIN, J.P., ROMAN, MILLER and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Austin, J.P.; Roman, Miller and Connolly, JJ.Susan Zachry, ap, v. William F. Comunale, res — Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 4, 2017, for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]).AUSTIN, J.P., ROMAN, MILLER and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.MATTER of Aliyah S. P. (Anonymous). Dutchess County Department of Community and Family Services, petitioner-res, Sabrina S. P. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Sabrina S. P. from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated January 24, 2018. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of James D. Meier, Esq., dated February 6, 2018, it isORDERED that the appellant is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Del Atwell, Esq.39 5th StreetEast Hampton, NY 11937631-267-2067and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the appellant at the address provided by this court, and on or before March 22, 2018, shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal, in writing, that he has done so and that either(1) the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal, or(2) the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, or that he has been unable to contact the appellant, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act §1116); and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant’s assigned counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the appellant’s assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant’s brief upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any   or orders issued pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,ORDERED that upon a determination that the appellant is interested in proceeding with the appeal, the assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jose Burgos, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 1, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged, and the reply brief submitted to the Clerk of this Court is accepted for filing and deemed timely served.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Nikita Pertsev, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 30, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Adriane Casterella, res, v. Anthony Casterella, ap — Appeal by Anthony Casterella from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated August 10, 2017. By   dated January 26, 2018, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days after the date of the  :(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript was expected; or(4) if the appellant was indigent and could not afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.The appellant has failed to comply with the  . Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the   dated January 26, 2018, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before April 3, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.MATTER of Susan R. Gavin, ap, v. Lawrence J. Worner, res — Appeal by Susan R. Gavin from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated November 30, 2017. By   dated January 26, 2018, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days after the date of the  :(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript was expected; or(4) if the appellant was indigent and could not afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.The appellant has failed to comply with the  . Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the   dated January 26, 2018, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before April 3, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Orell G. (Anonymous), ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 14, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Paul Pullini, ap, v. Michelle E. Giampaolo, res — F-17930-09/17C) — Appeal by Paul Pullini from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated November 20, 2017. By   dated January 26, 2018, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days after the date of the  :(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript was expected; or(4) if the appellant was indigent and could not afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.The appellant has failed to comply with the  . Pursuant to §670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it isORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with the   dated January 26, 2018, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before April 3, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties by regular mail.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Destiny Brown, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 30, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Todd Daniels, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 8, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Kenneth Ryan, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 13, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Shakie Brownfield, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 15, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Ernesto Legister, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 17, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Demort Robinson, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 17, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Rudolph Garbutt, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 18, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Ruslan Ivashkin, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 27, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,Ordered that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Stephan Gardner, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 19, 2017, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant’s and the respondent’s briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant’s counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant’s brief on the respondent; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order on motion upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the appellant’s sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the appellant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report, and to provide additional copies to this Court upon demand; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the Court and the District Attorney’s office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:Paul Skip Laisure, Esq.Appellate Advocates111 John Street – 9th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Cohen, Maltese and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of Allison G. (Anonymous). Dutchess County Department of Community and Family Services, petitioner-res, Howard I. (Anonymous), Jr., res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Sarah G. (Anonymous). Dutchess County Department of Community and Family Services, petitioner-res, Howard I. (Anonymous), Jr., res-res — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Howard I. (Anonymous). Dutchess County Department of Community and Family Services, petitioner-res, Howard I. (Anonymous), Jr., res-res — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Thomas I. (Anonymous). Dutchess County Department of Community and Family Services, petitioner-res, Howard I. (Anonymous), Jr., res-res — (Proceeding No. 4) N-471-16) — Renewed motion by the respondent-appellant pro se on an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated March 16, 2017, to waive the filing fee, for free transcripts, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this decision and order on motion, the respondent-appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4), above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Chambers, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ.Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., etc., res, v. Rivka Hershkop appellants def — Motion by the appellants to stay enforcement of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 26, 2017, and the foreclosure sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and enforcement of the judgment and the foreclosure sale of the subject premises, located at 1836 58th Street, Brooklyn, New York, are stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appeal is perfected on or before April 6, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before April 6, 2018, the Court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, without further notice, or the respondent may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice.MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI and COHEN, JJ., concur.MATTER of Floyd J. B. (Anonymous) IV, etc. Little Flower Children and Family Services of New York, petitioner-res, Floyd B. (Anonymous), etc., res-res — Appeal by Floyd B. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated January 23, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the respondent-appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the respondent-appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the respondent-appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the respondent-appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the respondent-appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Jamir T. (Anonymous), ap — Appeal by Jamir T. from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated January 12, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has beentaken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Daniel M. (Anonymous), ap — Appeal by Daniel M. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 22, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has beentaken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Cindy M. G. (Anonymous), appellant-child. Isidro M. C. (Anonymous), petitioner- appellant; Teodolinda G. D. M. (Anonymous), res — Separate appeals by Cindy M. G. and Teodolinda G. D. M. from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated December 5, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that each appellant shall perfect her appeals in the above-entitled proceeding within 60 days after the receipt of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , each appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeals; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing that appellant’s appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that an appellant does not take any of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why that appellant’s appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of April M. B. (Anonymous), ap — Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Phyllis B. (Anonymous), et al., res-res — N-509-17) — Appeal by April M. B. from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated November 24, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Logan R. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Manuel R. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Adam E. R. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Manuel R. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeals by Manuel R. from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, dated July 11, 2017, and January 22, 2018, respectively. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeals in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the respondent-appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the respondent-appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the respondent-appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeals; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the respondent-appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeals, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeals as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the respondent-appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Eian G. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Sykia G. (Anonymous), res-res — Janeen J. (Anonymous), nonparty-ap — Appeal by Janeen J. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated February 15, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the nonparty-appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the nonparty-appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the nonparty-appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has beentaken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Jefrey C.-V. (Anonymous), ap — Appeal by Jefrey C.-V. from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated January 11, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Luis Herranz, appellant-res, v. Sandra Longa, res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Sandra Longa, res-ap, v. Luis Herranz, appellant-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeals by Luis Herranz from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, both dated January 3, 2018, and cross appeal by Sandra Longa from the second order. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that Luis Herranz shall perfect the appeals in the above-entitled proceedings within 60 days after the receipt of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , Luis Herranz shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeals and cross appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if he is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeals, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeals as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from Luis Herranz, stating either that he qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his financial status has not changed since that time, or that he had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing his appeals; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals and cross appeal to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Krystle B. (Anonymous), petitioner- res, v. Crystal W. (Anonymous), res, James E. S. (Anonymous) III, ap — Appeal by James E. S. from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated January 8, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Mastro, J.P.; Chambers, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ.MATTER of Alex Anderson, Jr., ap, v. Mariah Angel Carey, res — Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated August 8, 2017, in effect, to waive the filing fee, for free transcripts, and for the assignment of counsel.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this decision and order on motion, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI and COHEN, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Chambers, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ.MATTER of Una-Bellelinda Alexandrice Titus, res, v. Aaron Garth Evans, ap — Appeals by Aaron Garth Evans from two orders of the Family Court, Nassau County, both dated September 14, 2017. By order to show cause dated January 18, 2018, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeals in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a   dated November 30, 2017, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeals is granted, and the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to comply with the   dated November 30, 2017, issued pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]).MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI and COHEN, JJ., concur.By Dillon, J.P.; Miller, Barros and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Michele Besosa, res, v. Eric C. Besosa, ap — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated January 23, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to timely perfect in accordance with the rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e], 670.4) and prior order of this Court.DILLON, J.P., MILLER, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.MATTER of Luis Herranz, appellant-res, v. Sandra Longa, res-res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Sandra Longa, res-ap, v. Luis Herranz, appellant-res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeals by Luis Herranz from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, both dated January 3, 2018, and cross appeal by Sandra Longa from the second order. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that Sandra Longa shall perfect the cross appeal in the above-entitled proceedings under Appellate Division Docket No. 2018-01880 within 60 days after the receipt of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , Sandra Longa shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeals and cross appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if she is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the cross appeal, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the cross appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from Luis Herranz, stating either that he qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his financial status has not changed since that time, or that he had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his assets and income; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the cross appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals and cross appeal to show cause why the cross appeal should or should not be dismissed.Susan A. Fritz-Duguid, res, v. Damian v. Duguid, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated September 11, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Jeffrey C. Danzer, res, v. Svandis Hreinsdottir, ap — V-1129-17) — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated October 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Puyi Tam, pet-ap, v. Justin Lubatkin, respondent-res, Sloane T. (Anonymous), nonparty-ap — Separate appeals by Puyi Tam and Sloane T. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated September 26, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that Puyi Tam’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing that appellant’s brief is enlarged until April 11, 2018.MATTER of June Buntele res-ap, v. Village of Wappingers Falls, New York appellants-res — Application by the respondents-appellants on an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated November 20, 2017, to withdraw the cross appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the cross appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Rhonda Root, res, v. Bradford Root, ap — F-9988-12/14I) — Appeals by Bradford Root from two orders of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated January 13, 2016, and July 6, 2016, respectively. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until April 2, 2018.Robert Ladick, res, v. Ward Melville Heritage Organization ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Chloe-Elizabeth A. T. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner-res, Albert T. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — Appeal by Albert T. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 16, 2017. Pursuant to §670.9(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 12, 2018.Nuciaratu Keys, ap, v. New York City Transit Authority res — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Tanika H. (Anonymous), res, v. Travaris E. M. (Anonymous), Sr., ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Travaris E. M. (Anonymous), Sr., ap, v. Tanika H. (Anonymous), res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Travaris E. M. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 10, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until March 30, 2018.Jeremy Malave, ap, v. City of New York res — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 1, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated March 1, 2018, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.Nina Godspote, res, v. Imperial Ocean Corp., ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Cori Harlem, ap, v. Town of Huntington, res — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated September 21, 2017.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated March 1, 2018, it isORDERED that the appeal is marked withdrawn.MATTER of Amaarie L. M. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Kelly R. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — Appeals by Kelly R. from three orders of the Family Court, Suffolk County, two dated June 16, 2017, and one dated June 20, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on March 2, 2018. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the child in the above-entitled appeals shall be served and filed.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Dorchester, LLC, res-ap, v. Herzka Insurance Agency, Inc., appellant- res — Application by the respondent-appellant on an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 26, 2017, and an appeal from an order of the same court dated September 6, 2017, for leave to withdraw its cross appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the cross appeal from the order dated June 26, 2018, is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Roberto Sequinot, etc. res, v. Independent Living Association, Inc., et al., ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 3, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Dillon, J.P.; Austin, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.Brian Jonas ap, v. Solstice Residential Group, LLC def, Michael Mager res — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 13, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated November 27, 2017, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.Susan Fritz-Duguid, res, v. Damian Duguid, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated November 30, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Rivera, J.P.; Chambers, Maltese and Barros, JJ.HSBC Bank USA, National Association, etc., res, v. Hasan Ozcan, etc., ap, et al., def — Motion by the appellant for leave to reargue an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 10, 2015 , which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated October 18, 2017, or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the decision and order of this Court.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied, with $100 costs.RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Chambers, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Benjamin Moreira, ap — Motion by the appellant pro se to enlarge the time to serve and file a supplemental brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 6, 2013.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant’s supplemental brief shall be served and filed on or before May 7, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant shall file nine copies of the supplemental brief and serve one copy on the District Attorney.MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI and COHEN, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Chambers, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ.MATTER of Jose Velez, ap, v. Morgan J. Dennehy, etc., res — Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 3, 2017, inter alia, to waive the filing fee.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]), and by serving and filing his brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 7, 2018.MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI and COHEN, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Chambers, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jose Pereyra, ap — Motion by the appellant on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered November 2, 2016, to be furnished with the transcript of the proceedings which occurred on October 19, 2016, in the above entitled matter.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied without prejudice to renew upon proper papers identifying the issue to be raised in connection with the transcript of the proceedings which occurred on October 19, 2016.MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI and COHEN, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Sgroi, Cohen and Barros, JJ.MATTER of Deborah D. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner- res, Elliot D. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Isaac D. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner- res, Elliot D. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — (Proceeding No. 2) — Motion by the appellant on an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated January 12, 2018, inter alia, to direct the Family Court, Kings County, to conduct and complete the hearing pursuant to Family Court §1028 within three days.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.MASTRO, J.P., SGROI, COHEN and BARROS, JJ., concur.MATTER of Deborah D. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner- res, Elliot D. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — MATTER of Isaac D. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner- res, Elliot D. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — Appeal by Elliot D. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated January 12, 2018. On February 26, 2018, the respondent-appellant advised the Court that the transcripts had been received. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that on or before May 7, 2018, the respondent-appellant shall either perfect the appeal or file an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent-appellant is directed to provide copies of the transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the children, if any, when the respondent-appellant’s brief is served upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that if the appeal is not perfected or withdrawn on or before May 7, 2018, the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Deborah D. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Elliot D. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — MATTER of Isaac D. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Elliot D. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — Appeal by Elliot D. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated October 24, 2017. On February 26, 2018, the respondent-appellant advised the Court that the transcripts had been received. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that on or before May 7, 2018, the respondent-appellant shall either perfect the appeal or file an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent-appellant is directed to provide copies of the transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the children, if any, when the respondent-appellant’s brief is served upon those parties; and it is further,ORDERED that if the appeal is not perfected or withdrawn on or before May 7, 2018, the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.By Mastro, J.P.; Chambers, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Gerard K. Fleming, ap — Motion by counsel assigned to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered January 21, 2016, to be relieved on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel. By order to show cause dated January 3, 2018, the appellant was directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant had abandoned the appeal, and the motion by assigned counsel to be relieved was held in abeyance in the interim.Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed; and it is further,.ORDERED that the motion by assigned counsel to be relieved is denied.MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI and COHEN, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Chambers, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jose Pena, ap — Motion by the counsel assigned to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered September 8, 2016, to be relieved on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel. By order to show cause dated January 3, 2018, the appellant was directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant had abandoned the appeal, and the motion by assigned counsel to be relieved was held in abeyance in the interim.Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed; and it is further,.ORDERED that the motion by assigned counsel to be relieved is denied.MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI and COHEN, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Chambers, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Severiano Martinez, ap — Motion by the appellant’s assigned counsel on an appeal from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County, imposed June 10, 2014, in effect, to be relieved on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel. By order to show cause dated January 18, 2018, the appellant was directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant had abandoned the appeal, and the motion by assigned counsel to be relieved was held in abeyance in the interim.Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed; and it is further,.ORDERED that the motion by assigned counsel, in effect, to be relieved is denied.MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI and COHEN, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Chambers, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. John Discon, ap — Motion by counsel assigned to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 31, 2016, in effect, to be relieved on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel. By order to show cause dated January 3, 2018, the appellant was directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant had abandoned the appeal, and the motion by assigned counsel to be relieved was held in abeyance in the interim.Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed; and it is further,.ORDERED that the motion by assigned counsel, in effect, to be relieved is denied.MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI and COHEN, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Chambers, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Isiah Nelson, ap — (S.C.I. No. 2952/16) — Motion by counsel assigned to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 26, 2017, in effect, to be relieved on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel. By order to show cause dated January 3, 2018, the appellant was directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant had abandoned the appeal, and the motion by assigned counsel to be relieved was held in abeyance in the interim.Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed; and it is further,.ORDERED that the motion by assigned counsel, in effect, to be relieved is denied.MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI and COHEN, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Chambers, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. David Solis, ap — Motion by counsel assigned to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 8, 2016, in effect, to be relieved on the ground that the appellant has abandoned the appeal by failing to respond to communications by assigned counsel. By order to show cause dated January 3, 2018, the appellant was directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant had abandoned the appeal, and the motion by assigned counsel to be relieved was held in abeyance in the interim.Now, upon the order to show cause and no papers having been filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed; and it is further,.ORDERED that the motion by assigned counsel, in effect, to be relieved is denied.MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI and COHEN, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Barros and Connolly, JJ.MATTER of Yu Wei, res, v. Robert Mathews, ap — Motion by the appellant to stay enforcement of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (IDV Part), dated January 23, 2018, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and enforcement of the order is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal.LEVENTHAL, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Barros and Connolly, JJ.Randall Joyner res, v. Middletown Medical, P.C. ap — Motion by the respondents to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated May 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the trial in the above-entitled action is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal.LEVENTHAL, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Barros and Connolly, JJ.Victoria Abadi, res, v. Joseph Abadi, ap — Motion by the appellant to stay enforcement of stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 20, 2017, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from the order.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Barros and Connolly, JJ.Valerie P. Burgess, etc., plf-res, v. City of New York def-res, United Rentals, Inc. ap — Motion by the appellant, in effect, to stay enforcement of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 16, 2017, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom. Separate motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal and to enlarge the record to include to include a certain order of the same court dated January 17, 2017. Cross motion by the respondent to dismiss the appeal for failure to timely perfect.Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the cross motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion, in effect, to stay enforcement of the order dated May 16, 2017, and the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the record are denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until April 9, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the cross motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.Oscar Alexandro Cevallos, res, v. Davidson Equities, LLC ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 10, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.MATTER of Megan Helen McGorman, res, v. Patrick M. McGorman, ap — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated February 22, 2018, in the above-entitled case is recalled and vacated, and the following decision and order on motion is substituted therefor:Appeal by Patrick M. McGorman from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated May 25, 2017. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Marvin J. Williams, Esq., dated January 17, 2018, it isORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act §1120, the following named attorney is assigned as the attorney for the child on the appeal:Kelley M. Enderley, Esq.301 Manchester Road, Suite 203Poughkeepsie, NY 12603845-485-7530and it is further,ORDERED that Marvin J. Williams, Esq., is directed to turn over all papers in the proceeding to the new attorney for the child herein assigned.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Glen Beam, res, v. 114 Hartley Road, LLC, ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated September 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Glen Hamer plf, v. New York University, defendant third-party plaintiff- res, Arma Scrap Metal Co., Inc., third-party def-ap — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 25, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated November 17, 2017, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.By Mastro, J.P.; Leventhal, Austin and Cohen, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Kevin Louis, ap — Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 31, 2011 (People v. Louis, 84 AD3d 1410), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 20, 2008.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant is granted leave to serve and file a brief on the issue of whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to dismiss the misdemeanor counts of the indictment as time barred; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to County Law §722, the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the application:Seymour James, Jr., Esq.The Legal Aid Society199 Water Street – 5th FloorNew York, New York 10038and it is further,ORDERED that assigned counsel shall file the brief expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.), and written directions; and it is further,ORDERED that the application is held in abeyance in the interim.MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, AUSTIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.Equity Recovery Corp., res, v. Joseph Sprei ap — Application by the appellant Miriam Aber to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 21, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal by Miriam Aber is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of National General Assurance Company, ap, v. Janet Chase Surette, et al., res — Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated December 14, 2016.Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties to the appeal dated February 22, 2018, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.John J. Dolce ap, v. City of New York res — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.Rinis, Inc., res, v. River Properties, Inc., ap — Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 17, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Scheinkman, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Violet Suk, res-ap, v. George Comfort and Sons, Inc. appellants-res, Excel Security Corp. res — Application by the appellants-respondents for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 2,2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Erik Borrero, res, v. Scott Frank ap — Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated September 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.By Leventhal, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Barros and Connolly, JJ.MATTER of Peter G. (Anonymous), ap — Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York, petitioner-res, Anthony J. Lamberti, etc., res-res — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 12, 2017. By order to show cause dated January 23, 2018, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal purportedly taken on behalf of Peter G. on the ground that Irina Galanova was not authorized to file a notice of appeal on his behalf.Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see Whitehead v. Town House Equities, 8 AD3d 369).LEVENTHAL, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Barros and Connolly, JJ.MATTER of Honesty M. M. M. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Taikeem L. W. (Anonymous), res-res — Motion by the respondent-appellant to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Family Court, Suffolk County, both dated January 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeals to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeals is enlarged until April 9, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.LEVENTHAL, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Barros and Connolly, JJ.Linda Alfini, ap, v. State of New York, res — (Claim No. 120551) — Motion by the appellant pro se to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims dated October 16, 2015, and, in effect, to waive payment of the filing fee and for free transcripts.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, and the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]), and by serving and filing her brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 9, 2018; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.